Jeffrey Hicks

Jeffrey Hicks

Platform Eng @R360

Good Strategy / Bad Strategy: Core Teachings

Richard Rumelt's framework for developing effective strategy through diagnosis, guiding policy, and coherent actions while avoiding common strategic pitfalls

By Richard Rumelt • Jan 9, 2025

Good Strategy is built on a clear understanding of challenges and a coherent set of actions to overcome them. In contrast, Bad Strategy is characterized by vague objectives, hollow slogans, and a failure to face critical issues. Below is a structured walkthrough of Richard Rumelt’s key ideas, tools, and frameworks for developing and recognizing effective strategy.

1. The Kernel of Good Strategy

Every robust strategy contains three interconnected elements:

  1. Diagnosis
    A frank, penetrating analysis of the essential challenge.

    • Identifies the crux of the situation.
    • Cuts through complexity to reveal the underlying problem.
  2. Guiding Policy
    An overall approach or method to address the diagnosis.

    • Establishes an “umbrella” under which coherent actions align.
    • Constrains and directs resource allocation.
  3. Coherent Actions
    A set of coordinated, focused steps that implement the guiding policy.

    • Each action reinforces the others.
    • Emphasizes leverage—small, well-focused moves yield outsized results.

2. Hallmarks of Bad Strategy

Rumelt identifies four common features of ineffective strategy:

FeatureDescription
FluffSuperficial, jargon-laden language replacing real analysis.
Failure to Face the ProblemLeadership avoids grappling with the real challenges at hand.
Mistaking Goals for StrategyEquating lofty ambitions or vision statements with an actual plan.
Bad Strategic ObjectivesBroad, impractical “to-do” lists without clear priorities or coherence.

3. Sources of Power in Good Strategy

Effective strategists leverage various forms of strength:

  • Leverage: Identifying focal points where effort yields disproportionate impact.
  • Proximate Objectives: Clear, achievable short-term targets that build momentum.
  • Chain Link Systems: Recognizing and strengthening the weakest link in a sequence of interdependent steps.
  • Using Design: Crafting structure and interactions deliberately, akin to an architect’s blueprint.
  • Focus: Concentrating resources on pivotal challenges rather than diffusing effort.

4. Strategic Thinking Tools

Rumelt offers actionable methods to craft strategy:

  • Leadership Leverage: Deploying executives’ scarce bandwidth on high-impact issues.
  • Kernel Mapping: Diagramming the diagnosis–policy–actions linkages to test coherence.
  • Pivot Points: Spotting events or changes that can shift competition.
  • Growth Traps: Avoiding the lure of growth for its own sake at the expense of real advantage.

5. Real-World Examples

Rumelt illustrates with multiple case studies:

  • NVIDIA vs. Intel: Focusing on graphics computing when competitors over-focused on CPU speed.
  • General Motors: Diagnosing quality issues and redirecting policy to rebuild manufacturing processes.
  • IKEA: Proximate objective of flat-pack furniture to reduce cost and streamline global logistics.

6. Implementing Good Strategy

To apply these lessons:

  1. Conduct a Rigorous Diagnosis
    Gather data, challenge assumptions, and identify the single most critical hurdle.
  2. Formulate a Guiding Policy
    Choose an approach that directly addresses diagnosis; avoid generic ambitions.
  3. Design Coherent Actions
    Sequence steps for maximum leverage; ensure each action supports the guiding policy.
  4. Monitor and Adapt
    Track progress on proximate objectives and adjust policy or actions as new insights emerge.

7. Key Takeaways

  • Effective strategy is about focus, clarity, and coherence, not lofty visions alone.
  • Avoid common pitfalls: superficial rhetoric, ignoring core problems, and mistaking goals for strategy.
  • Leverage small, well-targeted actions to create outsized strategic advantage.
  • Use real-world diagnoses and kernel mapping to test and refine your strategic approach.

By internalizing the kernel of good strategy and steering clear of its antithesis, organizations and leaders can transform complex challenges into clear, actionable plans that drive meaningful results.

Related

#product-management